Correct Option (C)
Approaching a higher authority to reconsider the leave application represents a procedurally sound and ethical approach. This action demonstrates adherence to established administrative protocols and a commitment to resolving disputes through legitimate channels. It allows for a formal review of the decision, especially when the employee has consistently met project deadlines, thereby upholding institutional decorum while asserting a legitimate request for leave. This method is transparent, accountable, and seeks a formal resolution without resorting to insubordination or deceit.
Incorrect Options:
Option (A): Proceeding on leave without waiting for sanction constitutes a direct act of insubordination and a breach of workplace discipline. Such an action can severely compromise professional credibility, disrupt project timelines, and invite formal disciplinary action, demonstrating a disregard for organizational protocols and authority.
Option (B): Pretending to be sick to take leave is an act of deliberate dishonesty and a serious ethical transgression. It undermines trust within the organization, violates professional integrity, and can lead to severe consequences if discovered, making it an unacceptable course of action in any professional environment.
Option (D): Telling the boss that the decision is not justified, while an attempt at direct communication, may not be sufficient to alter the decision if the immediate superior remains firm. This approach lacks the formal mechanism for reconsideration that an appeal to a higher authority provides, which is crucial when an employee's performance merits consideration for leave.